Each person throughout the life repeatedly faces conflicts of a different sort. We wish something to reach, but the purpose appears difficultly reached. We worry failure and are ready to accuse people surrounding us that we could not reach the desirable purpose. And associates - whether it be relatives or with whom you together work, believe, that you are guilty in own failure. Or the purpose has been incorrectly formulated by you, or means of its achievement are chosen unsuccessfully, or you could not estimate truly developed situation and circumstance to you have prevented. There is a mutual misunderstanding which gradually develops into discontent, conditions of a dissatisfaction, socially-psychological pressure and the conflict are created.
How to leave the developed situation? Whether it is necessary to undertake any special efforts to overcome it and again to win an arrangement of people surrounding you? Or it is not necessary to do it; simply it is not necessary to pay attention to how others concern you? To find the correct decision of this dilemma it is rather useful to know, that such the conflict as it is developed, through what phases passes and as it is authorised. In it sense of studying of conflicts. Other example will explain a conflict situation some other sort; and you, and your colleague apply for the certain blessing, but this blessing can belong only to one person. Such situation is called as a situation of a competition, competition, rivalry. On the basis of it develop rather naturally and simply disputed relations. Who will be the winner? Whether there will be indemnification to the one who will be the loser? How relations between people at the moment of competition or competition and what character of these relations will be subsequently will develop? It is possible to answer these questions only when you know something about conflicts, that such the conflict. The third example we will result from relations between the big groups of people. Openly large gas field. Its development will give an essential economic prize and at the same time the huge damage of surrounding district, to ecological equilibrium will cause, will lead to destruction of a traditional way of life of local population. As a rule, in such situations of opinion of people are divided. One stand up for the first variant and others appeal to progress and economic interests, - to ecological equilibrium and to necessity to protect customs and culture of the small people. The divergence in opinions easily turns to the group and personal conflict which eventually receives any permission. To find the optimum decision, it is necessary to possess not only knowledge of economic calculations, but also knowledge of how such conflicts develop. After all such situations arise everywhere. Collision of the points of view, opinions, positions - very frequent phenomenon of an industrial and public life. It is possible to tell, that such conflicts exist everywhere - in a family, on work, at school. To develop a true line of conduct in various conflict situations, it is very useful to know, that such conflicts and as people come to the consent. The knowledge of conflicts raises culture of dialogue and does human life not only quieter, but also steadier in the psychological relation. The most important conflicts between people and social groups concentrate in sphere of a policy. The policy is not that other, as a field of activity under the permission and reproduction of conflicts. Not casually long time in history of any human community is observed connection in one person of functions of the governor and the judge. The prince in the Old Russian state not only the military defender and the collector of a tribute, but also the judge. It defines, who is right also who is guilty in the conflicts arising between the creditor and the debtor, the seller and the buyer, applicants for the inheritance, the evolved children, wishing to separate from the parents contrary to their will, and in weight of other daily situations. At the same time a policy not only area of reconciliation of conflicting parties. Very often it appears means провоцирования conflicts. The policy is interfaced to the power. Everything aspire to the power not, but very many, in particular socially active people. But the number of imperious positions in a society is limited. If these imperious positions are not defined by norms of inheritance as it takes place at a monarchic political system necessarily there is a conflict between those who has some chances and possibilities to take those or other imperious positions. Struggle for such positions is rather extended in any society. Its character depends on a political mode which exists in the given society at present. Actually, the essence of any political mode consists that it defines political conflict forms in struggle for imperious powers. It defines those ways, using with which participants of political strike or a competition achieve the purposes, main of which - a victory over the opponent, the opponent, the contender. To study conflicts it is necessary to learn to understand a political life of a society not to appear a pawn in politics tricks, to understand chaos of political actions and directions and to participate in a political life even if this participation is limited to elections in the State Duma - quite meaningly, realising that ideal governors cannot be, that people all selected or appointed to the state posts - usual mortal. Their qualities both political, and human are in many respects defined by how they behave in the political conflicts, what parties of their person reveal in conflict situations. Hence, problems of studying of conflicts are many-sided. Everyone derives from this studying benefit for itself(himself). The businessman receives data on how the competition in the conditions of the market develops, the trade-union figure learns about methods of protection of interests of the professional group. The politician and the lawyer receive data on the precedents having for representatives of these sorts of activity special value. They receive here and theoretical knowledge as conflicts in a society develop not only at household level, they penetrate relations both in the state, and between the states. And «the simple person» studying of conflicts needs to get rid of "simplicity" and to receive those data without which it is impossible to be the citizen of the country, fatherland and to operate in compliance with civilisation principles in various, sometimes rather difficult political situations.
